Logo banner
masthead
Edition

In this edition of Eye on the Prize: The Road to Broad, brought to you by The Broad Foundation and the National Center for Educational Accountability (NCEA):

And the 2006 Broad Prize Finalists Are...

Collectively, they serve more than 1.5 million school children.

They have high minority, high poverty student populations.

And they're beating the odds by making exceptional gains in student performance.

We are pleased to announce the 2006 finalists for the $1 million Broad Prize for Urban Education:

  • Boston Public Schools
  • Bridgeport Public Schools, Conn.
  • Jersey City School District, N.J.
  • Miami-Dade County Public Schools
  • New York City Department of Education

The Broad Prize is an annual award that honors the nation's urban school districts making the greatest improvements in student achievement while reducing achievement gaps among ethnic groups and between high- and low-income students. The Broad Prize is the largest education award in the country given to a single school district.

"Improving student achievement is a tough task, especially in urban school districts," said Eli Broad, founder of The Broad Foundation. "We want to celebrate the improvement these districts have demonstrated, and we hope they are an example for other school systems."

The winning district will receive $500,000 in college scholarships for graduating seniors. Each finalist district will receive $125,000 in scholarships. The winner of the 2006 Broad Prize will be announced on Sept. 20 at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City.

This year, 100 urban school districts around the country were eligible for The Broad Prize. The five finalists were selected based on a rigorous review of data compiled and analyzed by the National Center for Educational Accountability. A Review Board of 16 prominent educational leaders from across the country evaluated the data and selected the five finalists.

Over the next two months, teams of educational researchers and practitioners will conduct site visits at each of the finalist school districts to gather statistical and qualitative information, including interviews with district administrators, focus groups with teachers and principals, and classroom observations. The teams will also talk to parents, community leaders, school board members and union representatives.

The performance data and site visit reports will then be presented to a Selection Jury, comprised of 13 prominent individuals nationwide from business and industry, education and public service, to choose the winning school district.

So why were these five districts selected as finalists?

Boston Public Schools
A fifth-time finalist for The Broad Prize, Boston Public Schools has a student population that is 86 percent minority and 73 percent low-income. Boston's achievements include:
   -- In the 2004-2005 school year, Boston students at all grade levels demonstrated significantly higher than expected proficiency in reading and math compared with other districts in the state that serve similar low-income populations.
   -- From 2002-2005, Boston students made greater gains in elementary and middle school reading and math proficiency than the state average.

Bridgeport Public Schools
First-time Broad Prize finalist Bridgeport Public Schools serves a student population that is 90 percent minority and 96 percent low-income. Among Bridgeport's achievements:
   -- In the past three years, Bridgeport has significantly reduced achievement gaps between African-American and Hispanic students and their white counterparts in elementary and high school reading and math.
   -- Bridgeport performed higher than expected in reading and math at all grade levels (2004-2005) given its poverty level.

Jersey City School District
This is the first year Jersey City School District is a finalist for The Broad Prize. The district has a student population that is 90 percent minority and 71 percent low-income. Jersey City's achievements include:
   -- For the last two years, the district has narrowed achievement gaps in elementary reading and math between low-income students and their higher-income peers and between African-American and Hispanic students and their white counterparts.
   -- Compared to other districts in New Jersey that serve students with high poverty levels, Jersey City performed higher than expected in reading and math in elementary, middle and high school.

Miami-Dade County Public Schools
First-time finalist Miami-Dade County Public Schools is the fourth largest district in the country and serves a student population that is 90 percent minority and 64 percent low-income. Miami-Dade's achievements include:
   -- Students in the district -- particularly low-income, African-American and Hispanic students -- demonstrated strong improvement in math performance between 2002 and 2005.
   -- The district has narrowed achievement gaps between low-income and higher-income students and between African-American and Hispanic students and their white counterparts in elementary and middle school reading and math.

New York City Department of Education
This is the second year New York City has been a finalist for The Broad Prize. The largest school system in the country, New York City Department of Education serves more than 1 million children, with a student population that is 85 percent minority and 68 percent qualifying for free or reduced price lunch. New York City's achievements include:
   -- Students at all grade levels have shown a marked increase in math proficiency since 2003.
   -- Elementary and middle school students perform better than expected in reading, and middle school students perform better than expected in math than students in other districts in the state with similar levels of poverty.

For more information about The Broad Prize and this year's finalists, please visit www.broadprize.org.

Data is a Four-Letter Word for Success

Without data, you are just another person with an opinion.

In this edition, we look at how three past Broad Prize finalists increased overall student achievement while narrowing gaps among all children by using one universal element: data. All of these districts have strong data and performance management systems and use data to guide decisions, programs and practices. They all have built a culture where teachers continually use data to hone and coordinate instruction across grades.

For many years the data management system in any given district consisted of annual student assessment reports provided by the state. But the information was available long after a classroom lesson was taught and even long after students had moved on to the next grade.

Prompted by the increased accountability requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act and the capabilities of the information age, districts are creating their own data systems, often with the help of outside vendors.

The best systems meet four criteria:

  1. They are easily accessible, typically through a secure website.
  2. They allow the user to "slice and dice" data in any format desired.
  3. They provide immediate assessment results.
  4. They provide numerous types of data, including formative and summative assessment results, demographic data, links to lesson plans, and curriculum guides, to name a few.

Strong data systems are a common thread among Broad Prize districts.

Three years ago, Boston Public Schools developed a web-based electronic data system called "MyBPS" that enables teachers, principals and central office administrators to easily access state, district and classroom data for individual students. "We've embraced the use of data and have made it easily accessible through the MyBPS portal down to the classroom level," says Boston Superintendent Tom Payzant.

In addition to state assessment results, the secure web-based system contains student report cards, a PDF of each student's writing composition and tutorials, including tips for interpreting the data and links to state standards.

The data system even allows users to determine how specific students, classrooms or schools perform on tests. For example, teachers can use the system to find out how their students perform on multiple-choice questions in English Language Arts.

"It's remarkable," says a Boston teacher. "You can sort your own class by different subgroups. Instead of requiring every teacher to be a data analyst, the tool does it and teachers can focus on learning objectives."

For more information on Boston's data system, please contact Chris Coxon, deputy superintendent for teaching and learning, 617-635-9400 or ccoxon@boston.k12.ma.us.

*****

The 2005 Broad Prize winner, Norfolk Public Schools in Virginia has used data as the navigation system to keep the district on track to meet goals and standards set at the classroom, school and district level.

The district discovered that real-time feedback in the form of student performance data is crucial for ensuring students learn the curriculum objectives. In addition to the district's required quarterly assessments, most Norfolk schools administer monthly assessments to give teachers frequent feedback on student performance. The district goes a step further by providing weekly common planning time for teachers to review student performance results and plan instruction. Additionally, each school has a data team that reviews group and individual student data to identify areas where teachers may need support.

"We look at items where students performed poorly both within our school and across the district," says one teacher. "Through this process we work together to discuss strategies and activities that could be used to address what is necessary to boost the students' understanding of a particular problem."

For more information about Norfolk's data system, please contact Melinda Boone at 757-628-3989 or mjboone@nps.k12.va.us.

*****

Just outside Houston, teachers and administrators at Aldine Independent School District use a customized student management data system called TRIAND. Teachers upload their classroom information onto the network, which also houses state test results, benchmark assessments and other student data.

In districts like Aldine where students transfer schools frequently, immediate access to real-time data on individual student performance is crucial. With TRIAND, a teacher can go online and retrieve student information for the current year and/or trace back three years. If a student moves from one school to another, the new teacher has instant access to the student's transcript and test scores.

To maximize effectiveness, the district requires every teacher to upload his or her classroom data into TRIAND, assisted by Scantron machines to eliminate hand entering of data. The data is then compiled into easy-to-read scorecards, which are reviewed quarterly at the district, feeder pattern, school, and sometimes classroom levels to ensure that all levels of the district are aligned with the goal of improving student achievement.

"We analyze the data right down to the individual skill and the individual problem on the test," says an Aldine principal. "If every kid misses #13, we either taught it the wrong way, or there was something wrong with that problem. We have to fix it for the benefit of the students."

The Texas district realizes that data is the equalizer that holds the key to student achievement. "There's no way people can deny the importance of using data to drive instruction," says an Aldine principal. "You can't say a teacher is being successful without the data. It's like going into court without evidence."

For more information on how Aldine uses data, please contact Wanda Bamberg, assistant superintendent of curriculum, at 281-985-6318 or wbamberg@aldine.k12.tx.us.